<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beatles Rarity Of The Week &#8211; Everyone Wins (b-side)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/</link>
	<description>For those of us who like our Beatles rare....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/?p=548#comment-203</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all good , Elliott and please know...I love your input. Can&#039;t wait to see what you think about tomorrows BROW...stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all good , Elliott and please know&#8230;I love your input. Can&#8217;t wait to see what you think about tomorrows BROW&#8230;stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Marx</title>
		<link>http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Marx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/?p=548#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I did not remember (or may have never known) that Wrack my Brain was written by George -By George! I do know Paul wrote Private Property. I&#039;m listening to Wrack right now and I absolutely hear George - though the solo is uncharacteristic, it&#039;s not slide and it sounds like a Telecaster. Too me Stop and Smell the Roses and Sometime in England have always reminded me of each other. I think I bought them both as cut-outs and I know they both came out around the same time. I have always thought that they both outshine McCartney II.

I&#039;ll give Y Not more time. There is just too much sheen and irrelevant production (drum loops, samples, Pro Tooly effects and such.)  I firmly believe artists should embrace whatever technology is current (if they want to)and continue making music up until the age they no longer wish to create art. In fact, I feel some artists get better and better as they age - how is it that Robert Plant released his first consistent solo album so late in his career? Sometimes however, (and it may be arbitrary)artists make creative moves that are commercially based (or youth targeted) and it seems, too me, misguided. I think there are ways to be commercially motivated and still maintain artistic integrity. For example working with T-Bone Burnett or Rick Rubin would create a lot of interest in the media. Working with those guys just smacks of integrity (for what that&#039;s worth.) While I feel both of those producers are great at what they do (particularly with veteran artists)hiring them is a fine way to garner attention (more so than using quasi-techno loops or whatnot.)

Ultimately, I wish that all of my musical heroes continue to put their trust in great, non-sycophantic producers. How good was Chaos and Creation? It was brilliant - because Nigel Godrich was not kowtowing to Paul.
I think Y Not loses the momentum that those Mark Hudson albums and Stewart&#039;s contribution to Liverpool 8 had started because the production and songwriting choices were not more closely monitored and edited. 

Unfortunately, I think about this stuff far too much. 

Lighten up Elliott, you don&#039;t sound like a Beatle fan. Don&#039;t you like anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not remember (or may have never known) that Wrack my Brain was written by George -By George! I do know Paul wrote Private Property. I&#8217;m listening to Wrack right now and I absolutely hear George &#8211; though the solo is uncharacteristic, it&#8217;s not slide and it sounds like a Telecaster. Too me Stop and Smell the Roses and Sometime in England have always reminded me of each other. I think I bought them both as cut-outs and I know they both came out around the same time. I have always thought that they both outshine McCartney II.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give Y Not more time. There is just too much sheen and irrelevant production (drum loops, samples, Pro Tooly effects and such.)  I firmly believe artists should embrace whatever technology is current (if they want to)and continue making music up until the age they no longer wish to create art. In fact, I feel some artists get better and better as they age &#8211; how is it that Robert Plant released his first consistent solo album so late in his career? Sometimes however, (and it may be arbitrary)artists make creative moves that are commercially based (or youth targeted) and it seems, too me, misguided. I think there are ways to be commercially motivated and still maintain artistic integrity. For example working with T-Bone Burnett or Rick Rubin would create a lot of interest in the media. Working with those guys just smacks of integrity (for what that&#8217;s worth.) While I feel both of those producers are great at what they do (particularly with veteran artists)hiring them is a fine way to garner attention (more so than using quasi-techno loops or whatnot.)</p>
<p>Ultimately, I wish that all of my musical heroes continue to put their trust in great, non-sycophantic producers. How good was Chaos and Creation? It was brilliant &#8211; because Nigel Godrich was not kowtowing to Paul.<br />
I think Y Not loses the momentum that those Mark Hudson albums and Stewart&#8217;s contribution to Liverpool 8 had started because the production and songwriting choices were not more closely monitored and edited. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, I think about this stuff far too much. </p>
<p>Lighten up Elliott, you don&#8217;t sound like a Beatle fan. Don&#8217;t you like anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/?p=548#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Elliot. You might need to give Y Not a few more listens. I think it&#039;s good. I just received my &quot;keepsake&quot; vinyl copy of it in the mail the other day. I always get the CDs but I can&#039;t break my attachment with having the vinyl.
 
Wrack My Brain is great too! He did that one with George, who is credited with not only writing it but also playing guitars on it (acoustic and electric I believe) and doing backing vocals. Quite catchy. I have an out-take version of it that I may post for BROW one of these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Elliot. You might need to give Y Not a few more listens. I think it&#8217;s good. I just received my &#8220;keepsake&#8221; vinyl copy of it in the mail the other day. I always get the CDs but I can&#8217;t break my attachment with having the vinyl.</p>
<p>Wrack My Brain is great too! He did that one with George, who is credited with not only writing it but also playing guitars on it (acoustic and electric I believe) and doing backing vocals. Quite catchy. I have an out-take version of it that I may post for BROW one of these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Marx</title>
		<link>http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Marx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/?p=548#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Ah, not lost to obscurity it has been rescued by you. You prove you&#039;re a fan and music lover/archivist by the good works you do here. You generously spend your time sharing your collection with lifelong fans and casual listeners. Thank you.
Now, I think Time takes Time and the early Mark Hudson produced albums were a great period for Ringo, if not a bit too self referential and Beatle-esque. Liverpool 8, contains perhaps my favorite Ringo song (after Stop and Smell the Roses and Wrack my Brain)Harry&#039;s Song - wow what a lovely, sentimental tune. Y Not just seems to fall flat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, not lost to obscurity it has been rescued by you. You prove you&#8217;re a fan and music lover/archivist by the good works you do here. You generously spend your time sharing your collection with lifelong fans and casual listeners. Thank you.<br />
Now, I think Time takes Time and the early Mark Hudson produced albums were a great period for Ringo, if not a bit too self referential and Beatle-esque. Liverpool 8, contains perhaps my favorite Ringo song (after Stop and Smell the Roses and Wrack my Brain)Harry&#8217;s Song &#8211; wow what a lovely, sentimental tune. Y Not just seems to fall flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/?p=548#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Guess I&#039;m still a bit partial to the older one too on that one, but I still like the Y Not album just as good or better than anything Ringo&#039;s put out since. It&#039;s a pity the older version is lost to obscurity. I figured it was a good one to bring back in a post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess I&#8217;m still a bit partial to the older one too on that one, but I still like the Y Not album just as good or better than anything Ringo&#8217;s put out since. It&#8217;s a pity the older version is lost to obscurity. I figured it was a good one to bring back in a post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Marx</title>
		<link>http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Marx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/?p=548#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Boy, I much prefer the older German version. The Y Not version has icky pitch correction and pro tools overload all over it. The 1992 may sound dated with the chunky guitars but it sounds like a real band.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, I much prefer the older German version. The Y Not version has icky pitch correction and pro tools overload all over it. The 1992 may sound dated with the chunky guitars but it sounds like a real band.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dermarhk</title>
		<link>http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/2010/01/18/the-beatles-rarity-of-the-week-107/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>dermarhk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebeatlesrarity.com/?p=548#comment-146</guid>
		<description>I like this a lot. No surprise, since TIME TAKES TIME is one of my fave Ringo releases. Glad to see it&#039;s on Y NOT, and hope that version is as good as this. I&#039;ll find out when I buy Y NOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this a lot. No surprise, since TIME TAKES TIME is one of my fave Ringo releases. Glad to see it&#8217;s on Y NOT, and hope that version is as good as this. I&#8217;ll find out when I buy Y NOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

